On Tuesday, the Supreme Court struck down a key provision of
the 1965 Voting Rights Act which allowed the government to determine which
states and counties can change voting laws and procedures. Yesterday the President weighed in on what he
thought of the decision: “They made a
mistake.”
In a 5-4 ruling, the Court said it could no longer enforce a
requirement that states or localities with a history of discrimination must get
federal government approval before changing their election laws or the way they
hold elections. The majority of justices
made their decision based on progress in race relations, civil rights laws and
states’ rights over 48 years since the law was originally passed. The court is obviously more optimistic about
the practice of civil rights than the president and some minority leaders in
this country.
Just as he did after the court’s decision on corporate
campaign donations in 2010, President Obama basically declared he knows more
about Constitutional law than the learned justices sitting on that high
bench. The President didn’t say that he
disagreed with the decision – he said the court made a mistake. What arrogance one must possess to twice
declare the Supreme Court of the United States was wrong in their decision. He’s an elected official, put in office not
for his experience and outstanding wisdom but more for his popularity. He has no judicial experience. And from what I’ve read he doesn’t have a
whole lot of experience teaching Constitutional law either (since most of his
former colleagues at the University of Chicago say he was rarely there.)
So as rare as it is – I'm going to share my thoughts on it. Many liberals like to tout the changes in race
relations and how only Republicans are racist these days. And since there are, by polls, more
liberal/progressives in the country these days, you would think there would be
more understanding and tolerance of the Supreme Court’s decision. But liberals and race oriented activists seem
to think that Southern states can’t abide by civil rights laws.
The truth is that many liberals like to turn just about
everything into a racist issue. If you are
a conservative/Republican and you criticize the current President, regardless
of the reason, you’re a racist. If you
want the borders secured and want to stop people from entering the country
illegally, you’re a racist. If you want
more people working and less people on government handouts, you’re a racist. If you own a gun and believe it is your right
as an American you’re a racist. If you
disagree with people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson you’re a racist. If you use words like Constitution, anger,
Chicago, food stamp President, Obamacare, you people, etc., you’re a
racist.
I know this because I’ve been called a racist several times
over the last few years for one or more of the things listed above. I can always justify the things I say with
facts and educated opinions but those who refuse to listen don’t care about
that. Many liberals are so busy screaming
the R word they don’t hear the actual facts you’re giving them. But I think that’s their intention. If they scream the R word long enough and
loud enough they think we’ll just be quiet.
I’ve long understood that one of the liberal mottos is “Don’t try to
confuse me with facts – my mind is made up.”
The R word is merely self-defense against truth.
So why wouldn’t liberals disagree with the Supreme Court
decision to allow states to determine their own voting laws when they could use
it to keep a long standing racial issue going?
In the next election, if the states that were governed by that law go to
the right then liberals can point and say “I told you so.” (It won’t matter at all to them if the states
went to the right in the last election.
That will be irrelevant.)
To the President I would say this – if you think the Supreme
Court is so bad why not resign the Presidency and try to get yourself appointed
as a justice? I’m sure you could make it
happen. Those who got you to the White
House would surely help you get there as well. Or maybe you could sign an executive order giving yourself Supreme Court authority. Then you could use your vast knowledge of the law to make the “correct”
decisions and fix the wrong decisions made by the current court. After all…
you seem to know best.
No comments:
Post a Comment