In a story out of Cranston, Rhode Island, father/daughter
and mother/son evens (such as dances) have been banned in the Cranston public school
system. The reason behind the ban is a
complaint filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of a
single mother whose daughter could not attend the dance. Although federal anti-discrimination laws
make exceptions for things like dances, Rhode Island state law apparently does
not and, in fact, explicitly bans “sex
discrimination... 'in any and all school functions and activities.'"
Now, as much as I can sympathize with
a single mother who wants her child to be included even though the child's
father is not there, why would someone want to prohibit all the other fathers
and daughters from enjoying an evening together? Would that single mother feel the same way if
her son invited her to a mother/son dance?
And how would she feel if she was getting ready to take her son to said
dance and the school said "Sorry - we can't hold the dance because a
father whose son has no mother can't go so you can't either?" It's
certainly "fair" but is it right?
It seems some people these days just
don't want anyone to be happy or have something special if they can't have it
too. And because of that they don't want
anyone to have what they don't have. In
my life I've been a single father. I
never would have imagined trying to prevent someone from having a fun evening
with their child simply because I didn't qualify for that particular
event. But then - I don't think like
that mother in Rhode Island or the ACLU.
Life isn't fair. No matter what some people think, some
politicians want to say, what the ACLU does - at the end of the day life is
still not fair or equitable for everyone.
Steven Brown of the Rhode Island ACLU told the
local news channel “This is 2012 and they [public schools] should not be in the
business of fostering blatant gender stereotypes.”
Scientific research on child behavior
has proved that the absence of a father in a child's life can be the cause of
many behavioral and emotional development problems. And before anyone starts in on me read it
again - I said "can". I'm not
going to get into the gay parenting thing - that's not the purpose of this
post. My point is that denying gender
roles in heterosexual families is just as wrong as the "blatant gender
stereotypes" Brown appears to be talking about. Why deny children of straight parents (and
those who are both still around) the opportunity to enjoy that? If they're so inclined to destroy gender
stereotypes, rather than prohibit events like this why doesn't someone promote
a gender ambiguous event or a single mothers' event or a homosexual
parents' event. No - that would allow the old fashioned family
to continue doing what they see as normal.
We can't have that now, can we?
The bottom line here is that, in my humble opinion,
banning a father/daughter dance to promote gender identity equality,
particularly when only one person
complains about it, is ridiculous. Even
in 2012, the ACLU should not prevent an event that helps parents and children
bond. Most daughters in the country have
fathers. (And biologically they all do.) Most sons have mothers. (Same biological stats.) The ACLU thinks the special status between
parents and children should only count if everyone is happy. As I said - life isn't fair. Sometimes you just don't get what you
want. Sometimes your kid doesn't get
what they want. That's reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment