Wednesday, June 5, 2013

IRS, Eric Holder and Susan Rice...

As the mainstream media and Democrats continue to pretend there’s nothing to it, the Congressional investigation into the IRS targeting conservative groups continues to uncover more and more evidence of wrongdoing that stretches all the way to the White House.

When the scandal first became public, Jay Carney (the administration's "paid liar" according to Congressman Darryl Issa) categorically denied that the White House had any knowledge of the IRS actions.  Unfortunately for Jay, the Congressional investigation has revealed that the White House did know about it and, in fact, may have been deeply involved.  IRS employees called to testify have said that as far as they were told, all files they forwarded to the White House were requested by same.  We now know that the White House Legal Counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, and former White House Chief of Staff, Jack Lew, were informed of the targeting last year, prior to the election.  It has also been revealed that President Obama’s deputy campaign manager, Stephanie Cutter, was aware of the IRS targeting. 

It is now known that Stephanie Cutter was in many of the meetings the IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman.  In Cutter’s own words on Jake Tapper’s show recently: "I was in them with him so there was nothing nefarious going on." 

Now I don’t know about you but that makes me feel much better.  After all, Stephanie Cutter was involved with the Obama Super PAC that made the commercial, during the campaign, in which steelworker Joe Soptic recounted how his wife died of cancer after he lost his health insurance when his plant was shuttered after a takeover by Bain Capital and other companies working with Romney's private equity firm.  Every bit of it turned out to be lies.

Is there a chance the President didn’t know about it?  I would say yes.  Think about it – if members of the Obama inner circle were directing (or at least encouraging) the IRS to target conservative political action groups during the race for the presidency, why would they tell the President?  If they told him he could become entangled in an investigation and end up taking the same route as Richard Nixon.  (He still could, by the way.)  If they didn’t tell him if gives him plausible deniability.  Even if some of his staff are charged, it’s very possible he can honestly deny knowledge of any wrongdoing because his staff protected him during the campaign.  What I don’t believe, however, is that after the election they didn’t tell him and that he didn’t know about it at all until it became public.

Stephanie Cutter telling us that “nothing nefarious was going on” during the meetings of the IRS Commissioner and the White House (notice they never say who in the White House?) is about as trustworthy as President Obama appointing Eric Holder to investigate the Justice Department in the AP/press phone records seizure.  Holder testified before Congress that he knew nothing about the investigation, that it was his assistant who was in charge of it.  Yet the Congressional investigation has revealed that Eric Holder himself signed off on a search warrant for FOX News’ White House Correspondent James Rosen’s phone records and private e-mails.  In the warrant, which was denied by two judges prior to being approved by a third, Rosen was depicted as “a possible co-conspirator” and “a flight risk” in violations of the Espionage Act.

The Justice Department later said they were never going to go after Rosen with espionage charges.  So it seems that not only did Holder lie to Congress about knowledge of the investigation but that he also lied to the judge to get the warrant approved.  And this from our Attorney General?  (Really, is anyone surprised?)


In early news this morning, it has been announced that National Security Advisor Tom Donilon will be stepping down and UN ambassador Susan Rice will be appointed to take his place.  It seems Susan Rice will finally reap her reward for her blind loyalty to the President.  Rice, who is better known for putting out false information about Benghazi than for being a UN Ambassador, does not have to be confirmed by the Senate to become the National Security Advisor so the President will finally be able to pay her back without any real opposition.  But can someone, anyone, tell me what qualifications she has to be the National Security Advisor?  Wait, what am I saying?  Qualifications and experience don’t matter with this administration….


No comments:

Post a Comment