The news of the school shooting in
Florida yesterday kind of put a damper on joy that many feel on
Valentine's Day. The horror of hearing about 17 students being
senselessly murdered at the hands of an obviously twisted young man
was heartbreaking to say the least. My thoughts and prayers go out to
everyone affected by this terrible tragedy.
Immediately, before the dead and injured had even been taken from the scene, the anti-gun advocates
began blaming the weapon used and blaming the National Rifle Association.
They didn't even know how the shooter obtained the weapon yet they said more laws are necessary to prevent this from happening.
Was the gun his? Was the gun stolen?
Was the gun given to him by someone else? Until these questions are
answered there is no logical way one can say “More laws are needed
to prevent this.”
The other question is “Do those laws work?” Short of outlawing all AR-15s and proceeding with a nationwide forced confiscation process (which not only wouldn't get them all but would be massive government overreach), new laws won't prevent crazy people from obtaining the weapon(s).
The other question is “Do those laws work?” Short of outlawing all AR-15s and proceeding with a nationwide forced confiscation process (which not only wouldn't get them all but would be massive government overreach), new laws won't prevent crazy people from obtaining the weapon(s).
California has some of the most strict
gun laws in the country, particularly concerning AR-15s. Yet the San
Bernardino shooters managed to go around the laws by getting a third
party to purchase their weapons. Laws only work for honest people.
Some say more thorough background
checks could have prevented this incident. There has been one report
that the gun used by the shooter was legally purchased by the shooter
himself. That has not been verified. There are questions about how he
would be able to purchase the weapon given his history of problems in
school and his odd behavior. We don't know what was in his record as
far as mental health issues and treatment. We know he was considered
“weird” by his classmates and that he had been expelled from
school and it is being reported that he was being treated at one time
for mental health issues but that he stopped going to treatment.
Should there be an automatic ban on gun purchases for anyone expelled
from school? Should there be an automatic ban on gun purchases for
anyone who has ever sought mental health treatment?
The old narrative that “There are no
background checks done at gun shows” is simply false. All federally
licensed gun dealers at gun shows are required to do background
checks just like they are required at any store where firearms are
sold. Some states allow non-licensed sellers to participate in gun
shows but each of three studies that I read said that the results of
their studies were “inconclusive” as to what percentage of
sellers were not licensed.
Some states don't require background
checks for private sales but if the gun in this instance was
purchased legally, changing that law would be irrelevant.
It is now being reported that the shooter's behavior was reported to the FBI back in September. I can't verify that at this time either but if it's true - who dropped the ball? Or was his behavior not enough to make him a person of interest?
It is now being reported that the shooter's behavior was reported to the FBI back in September. I can't verify that at this time either but if it's true - who dropped the ball? Or was his behavior not enough to make him a person of interest?
The simple fact is that more gun laws
will not prevent a crazy person from getting his/her hands on a gun
and killing people if that is their intention. The San Bernardino
shooters proved that. The Sandy Hook shooter proved that. He killed
his mother and stole her gun. The Texas church shooter was able to
buy guns because the Air Force failed to enter his criminal
background information into the FBI database. The Las Vegas shooter
purchased his weapons legally but there was nothing in his background
to prevent that and no way his intentions could have been
predicted.
People say the one common thing about these shootings is the AR-15. But the most common thing about these shootings is the people factor. No gun, be it handgun, “AR-15 assault rifle,” shotgun, hunting rifle, etc., kills anyone without a person pulling the trigger. And in the cases of these mass shootings those people are disturbed.
People say the one common thing about these shootings is the AR-15. But the most common thing about these shootings is the people factor. No gun, be it handgun, “AR-15 assault rifle,” shotgun, hunting rifle, etc., kills anyone without a person pulling the trigger. And in the cases of these mass shootings those people are disturbed.
More gun laws are not going to prevent
bad guys from obtaining weapons and killing innocents. That's just
the sad truth that is proved every day around the country. Perhaps
arming teachers or hiring armed security (such as unemployed
veterans) would be a better solution to school shootings. Gun free
zones are always targets. Why give them the opportunity?
No comments:
Post a Comment