There are three words in the English
language that I would like to see removed from conversation, at least
here in the United States. If removal is not possible, people should
be required to use them in proper context or not at all. Those three
words? Homophobic, Islamophobic, and xenophobic.
People toss the words around when
trying to make a point against someone who has issues with
homosexuality, Islam and/or immigrants. They don't realize that in
nine out of ten instances they are likely using the wrong verbiage.
Or perhaps they know and use it anyway.
Webster's Dictionary defines a phobia
as “an exaggerated, usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a
particular object, class of objects, or situation.”
Other dictionaries define it as an
irrational fear. So let's put the definitions in context with the
words above.
Disagreeing that homosexuality is a
“normal lifestyle” or an acceptable practice, in most cases,
does not involve fear of homosexuals. Most people who object to it
can very clearly state their reasons why they object so it's not
inexplicable. Neither is that objection exaggerated unless that
person takes extreme action against the LGBT community. I don't
really know anyone who has a fear of homosexuals. So the word
homophobic is not accurate to describe someone who disagrees with the
lifestyle.
Islamophobic is a word that has gained
popularity since 9/11. And it is also substantially misused in
today's society. Most people who speak out against Islam do not speak
out in fear. They speak out in anger at the Islamic terrorists who
are wreaking havoc all over the world. And since there is no
foolproof way to properly vet Muslims entering the country as
tourists and immigrants, to ensure they are not connected with a
terrorist organization, they want to limit immigration of Muslims
until such time a proper vetting can be accomplished. That's sound
immigration management.
Is it fear and, if so, is it
inexplicable?
I'd say if it's fear of a growing
terrorist threat here in the United States it's certainly not
inexplicable. Terrorism carried out by Muslims is real. A look back
at Orlando and San Bernardino proves that very easily. So a fear of
terrorism by Muslims here I the United States is not irrational –
unless you lock yourself in a bunker and refuse to come out because
of that fear.
The bottom line is that most people who
label someone as Islamophobic are doing so incorrectly.
Xenophobia is defined as “intense or
irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.”
This word is hurled at people who
disapprove of illegal immigration or who support the travel ban
issued by President Trump. That's because those who use the word are
projecting their own beliefs onto those they label.
In the United States of America we have immigration laws. Within those laws are wording that forbids people from crossing our borders illegally and sneaking into our country. There is nothing irrational about wanting those laws enforced and wanting people to enter our country legally. To believe otherwise is ridiculous.
Many say our immigration policy is broken. I submit that the main thing broken about it is enforcement. If law enforcement and politicians would join together to ensure our immigration laws were enforced we wouldn't have eleven or twelve million (estimated) people in the country illegally.
Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to several million illegal aliens in 1986 with a promise from Congress that they would take action to secure our borders. Congress agreed... but apparently had their fingers crossed behind their backs. Illegal entry into the country has only increased since then with the worst incident happening in 2014, when unaccompanied children from Central and South America flooded over our Southern border.
President Obama pretended that he had “deported more illegal immigrants than any other President.” Except that wasn't quite true. Obama manipulated the numbers by counting those turned around at the border as deported – even though they hadn't actually entered the country.
In the United States of America we have immigration laws. Within those laws are wording that forbids people from crossing our borders illegally and sneaking into our country. There is nothing irrational about wanting those laws enforced and wanting people to enter our country legally. To believe otherwise is ridiculous.
Many say our immigration policy is broken. I submit that the main thing broken about it is enforcement. If law enforcement and politicians would join together to ensure our immigration laws were enforced we wouldn't have eleven or twelve million (estimated) people in the country illegally.
Ronald Reagan granted amnesty to several million illegal aliens in 1986 with a promise from Congress that they would take action to secure our borders. Congress agreed... but apparently had their fingers crossed behind their backs. Illegal entry into the country has only increased since then with the worst incident happening in 2014, when unaccompanied children from Central and South America flooded over our Southern border.
President Obama pretended that he had “deported more illegal immigrants than any other President.” Except that wasn't quite true. Obama manipulated the numbers by counting those turned around at the border as deported – even though they hadn't actually entered the country.
Being a supporter of legal immigration
does not make one xenophobic any more than opposing Islamic terrorism
and supporting proper vetting makes one Islamophobic. And disagreeing
with the LGBT community based on sound logic and yes, even science,
does not make one homophobic.
If you're one of those who likes to use
these labels please think about what you're saying and whether or not
you're using the word(s) correctly. When anti-Trump fanatics go on a
diatribe about him they put all these labels on him, along with
misogynist, racist and sexist. It gets old.
Words are important. Misusing them to attack someone doesn't make the attacker look intelligent. The misuse of the words makes them look ignorant.
Words are important. Misusing them to attack someone doesn't make the attacker look intelligent. The misuse of the words makes them look ignorant.
I could not agree more. because words matter and if one doesn't your right, also I would like to have the word Righteousness removed, Because there is no dictionary meaning for the word Eous Now we know that Right means to do that which is right. It was to by this 93 year old retired English teacher that eous was a suffix for the seldom used word usage in that it describes the very uses of the words, Like, the right use ness of the words of God will bears fruit,and the un- right- uses ness of God's word will bear no fruit. Righteousness is visionary, Right use ness in our everyday Lives.
ReplyDelete