Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Cruising Main Street....


My posts today and tomorrow will be a little different.  An old childhood friend (and fairly new Facebook friend) has read some of my blogs and recently told me I should stop writing so many negative political posts and write something positive and happy.  I tried to explain to her that writing negative political blogs makes ME happy but she didn’t want to hear it.  I did have an idea that came to me the other day that I wanted to put down in writing.  It’s about memories from 36 years ago…

As I wrote this it grew longer and longer.  I have more memories from that short period of my life than I thought.  So this is Part 1 of my story about my experience with small town life in the mid 70s.  It's dedicated to my buddies from those days...  Jeff Sycks, Jon Kissner and Bumble Jacobs.  I hope you all enjoy my tale but at the least - I hope my old buddies enjoy the trip down memory lane.


Cruising Main Street....

In 1976, when I was 19, my parents moved from Struthers, Ohio, a suburb of Youngstown, to Coshocton, Ohio, a small town in farm country in Central Ohio.  Being 18 and having a job that didn’t support me living on my own at the time, I went along with them.  Besides - a new town would be a challenge.  

Coshocton was a nice little town but I didn’t have much to do and didn’t have a job for the first six months I was there.  I did, however, have a friend that came about through our church.  His name is Jeff Sycks and he lived one street over from us on the opposite corner.  He was two years younger than me but we hit it off anyway.  We got to know each other at the church but we started hanging out in the evenings and on weekends and played tennis at the high school courts, which were about two blocks from my house.  I beat him most of the time because I had been playing longer than he.  But it was fun.

In October of ’76 I developed appendicitis and ended up in the hospital for a week.  Jeff came to visit me and brought a couple of his friends along (who I had never met.)  Allow me to introduce you to Jon and Bumble….

Jon Kissner was a friend of Jeff’s from high school who turned out to be a great friend to me as well.  He drove a little Honda Civic at the time – you know – the ones that you could practically pick up and move on your own.  It suited him well.  He played the guitar (as did I) and loved music and we used to listen to various albums (Doobie Brothers, Wild Cherry, Peter Frampton, Kansas and Heart, to name a few) at his house, in the car, wherever we could.  There was also the extremely vulgar (and very popular) Richard Pryor as well as George Carlin and Cheech and Chong.    Good comedy tapes were always a plus and we had them all memorized.

Bumble Jacobs (his first name was really Lynn), was another friend of Jeff and Jon.  He was a year younger than me, graduated in 76, and after we met he and I hung out together more than any of the others because they were still in school.  He worked at the local GE plant but we did a lot of things together on his days off and after he got off work.  One of his special talents was chugging a large mug of A&W root beer in one large gulp.  Anytime we went to A&W to eat we’d be sure and buy him a large mug so he could do it again.  None of the rest of us could ever do it.

There were a couple of others.  Andy Brown – another classmate of Jeff’s who also attended our church, and John Wilt, a year younger than Jeff but he had his own car and he was pretty cool to hang out with.

Coshocton, Ohio, as I said, was/is a small town.  The people are friendly but even in 2010 only 11,000 people lived there.  There wasn’t a lot to do as far as entertainment.  But we always found something fun.  When we weren’t hanging out at someone’s house we were on the road, mostly.  Columbus was about 90 minutes West, Newark was in between Coshocton and Columbus, and Canton was about 90 minutes Northeast.  Columbus and Canton had malls.  Columbus also had Ohio State University located (very appropriately in our way of thinking) on High Street.  We laughed about that every time we drove over there.  

Both Canton and Columbus also had Peaches Records and Tapes, a large store chain that sold every album you could want in record, cassette and 8 track tape form.  Yes, we are that old.  And we hit those stores about once a month, constantly searching for the perfect album.

Canton mall was a good place to go as well.  We would make a day of it since at least three hours was needed for the drive.  We’d find someplace to eat, either on the way up or back, (often it was the Pizza Hut in New Philadelphia, about half way) and it really didn’t matter if we bought anything while we were shopping.  It was an adventure!

In January of ’77 I got a job driving a delivery truck for a small, family owned bakery that was located in the tiny town of Dresden, about 17 miles Southwest of Coshocton.  It took me about 30 minutes to get there because of the country roads.  I’d get my truck, turn around and head back into Coshocton for my route.  It wasn’t a bad job – but the hours sucked.  I had to be at the bakery by 4am so I got up at 3:30, got dressed and headed out.  I’d check my truck, (it was already loaded for me) and head back the same way, making a stop at a grade school in one little town on the way.  I’d hit all the schools in town that had a contract with us, stop at the county jail, then go to a small restaurant/bar around 6am to make a delivery and have breakfast.  The lady who ran that place early in the mornings made the best sausage and eggs.  And she had great coffee.  And every morning there was one gentleman sitting at the bar having a beer before he went to start his day on the farm.  Actually it was usually two or three.  I kid you not.

My work day normally went from 4am until around 4pm.  I was off on Wednesday and Sunday.  On Saturdays I got a little reprieve – I didn’t have to start until 5 (since the schools were closed) and some of my other stops were only during the week.  So I was normally home by around 4pm.  Not a huge difference but it enabled me to get home and take a nap before going out with the guys on Saturday night.

The title says “Cruising Main Street”  because that was one of the major things we did, particularly on Saturday nights.  Similar to “American Graffiti”, all the kids in town with cars would cruise up and down Main Street, music blaring, windows down in the warmer weather, and spend time just looking to see who else was cruising.  Of course, none of us had the car that Harrison Ford or Paul Le Mat had in the movie.  Bumble did have a 72 Olds Cutlass for a while, which he traded for a 76 Trans Am.  But there were no 32 Ford Coupes or 55 Chevys in our group.

We’d cruise Main Street several times to see what was going on.  We’d make a U-turn at the end of the street and head back in case we missed something.  More often than not we’d encounter a train at least once an evening and have to sit and wait for it to pass through.  The train went through the center of town on a north/south track.  On Saturday nights it backed traffic up all the way through town.  Of course, once it was gone we’d have to take a few more trips up and back to see if anything had changed…

Occasionally, if we weren’t all together, we’d see one of the other guys in his car and make plans to meet somewhere.  Often that was either the bowling alley or Wayne’s Freeze – one of the local ice cream/burger joints where a few of our favorite Coshocton girls worked.  We’d go to Wayne’s just about every day at one point or another.  Wayne was a good guy - a small business owner who gave many of the high school girls their first jobs.  His burgers were good and the ice cream and milk shakes were great in the summer!  I delivered burger and hot dog buns to them.  In fact, that’s where I met Tom Cannon, one of the owners of the bakery and the man who gave me my job.

On Wednesdays we’d all meet at the bowling alley.  It was open bowling, no leagues, and we’d spend a couple of hours there just having fun.  Of course, after that we’d head back to Main Street to see who was around.

My bakery delivery job had some great perks as well as drawbacks.  The hours were long but I knew most of the grocery store and restaurant managers in town.  That had its advantages.  For one thing, I could buy alcohol in any of the little family owned stores that I delivered to because they all knew me.  And even though I wasn’t 21, they thought I was.  I never told them otherwise.  So when we needed beer or wine for a party I could get it.  Of course, my parents never knew about it.  I wasn’t stupid.

Monday, February 4, 2013

Ron Paul Comments On The Murder Of Chris Kyle...


Chris Kyle, a former Navy SEAL and the most successful sniper in the history of the U.S. military, was killed yesterday by another veteran who suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.  Kyle was a volunteer at a resort lodge in Texas where PTSD victims were often taken to use firearms in an attempt to get them used to firearms again, without fear or negative reaction.

Congressman Ron Paul, who has run three times (and failed, thank God) for President, posted the following comment on Twitter today.  “Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense.”  Congressman Paul apparently believes he knows what is best for people suffering from PTSD but seems to know the details of the program the suspect was in.  At least he should if he's making comments like that.

I must say I also question if the shooting suspect, who has been arrested and charged with murder, was ready to be on the firing range yesterday.  But unlike Ron Paul, I am waiting to hear more details of the case before I make any decisions on that.  In my opinion, Paul’s comment echoes that of President Obama when he said  "I don’t know – not having been there and not seeing all the facts.... but I think it’s fair to say... that the Cambridge police acted stupidly..."  in the case involving the President’s friend, Professor Louis Gates and the Cambridge, Massachusetts, Police Department.  How can you pass judgment on someone, or on the program he was in, until you know all the facts?  Maybe Ron Paul has all the facts but I’m guessing, from the vagueness of his comment, that he’s simply speaking out of ignorance.

Chris Kyle was a true American hero.  He spent four tours in Iraq serving his country.  Regardless of whether or not his killer should or should not have been on that firing range yesterday his death is a tragedy and Ron Paul should show a little respect for the man and his history, particularly being former military himself.  Maybe his time in Washington has allowed him to become cold hearted when it comes to our military.  He is, after all, in favor of isolationism when it comes to foreign relations.  Either way, Chris Kyle deserves respect and honor given his service to his country. 

Chris Kyle served four tours in a combat zone.  Ron Paul served for two years as an active duty flight surgeon in the U.S. Air Force then an additional three years in the reserves as an Obstetrician.  While his service is noteworthy – it simply doesn’t compare to Mr. Kyle’s.  Maybe he has forgotten what military service is about.

I guess it’s obvious by now that I’m a little irritated by Ron Paul’s flippant attitude toward an American hero.  Those who knew Kyle have offered that not only was he a hero but a genuinely good man.  To have a former Congressman make snide comments about his murder is shameful, to say the least.  Mr. Paul should apologize to Chris Kyle and his family.  Mr. Kyle deserves better from someone who served in office as a Republican.  Paul’s comment sounded like it came from a liberal.

Friday, February 1, 2013

A Little Trivia.... Do You Know The Correct Answer?


The following trivia questions were posted on Facebook by my good friend Mark Atterson.  He wanted to see how much history we knew or could at least guess.  I didn’t know the correct answer to any of the questions.  I was somewhat surprised at the correct answers of who actually made each statement and it was a little disheartening.  I will let you all read the questions and take your best guess before revealing the correct answers. 

Please try to answer all the questions before looking at the answers.

Who said it?

1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

A. Karl Marx
B. Adolph Hitler
C. Joseph Stalin
D. None of the above

2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few....  and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."

A. Lenin
B. Mussolini
C. Idi Amin
D. N one of the Above

3) "(We) .....can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."

A. Nikita Khrushev
B. Josef Goebbels
C. Boris Yeltsin
D. None of the above

4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground."

A. Mao Tse Dung
B. Hugo Chavez
C. Kim Jong Il
D. None of the above

5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."

A. Karl Marx
B. Lenin
C. Molotov
D. None of the above

6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."

A. Pinochet
B. Milosevic
C. Saddam Hussein
D. None of the above

How many did you get right?  Was it an easy quiz or a difficult one?  There have been so many dictatorial and tyrannical leaders in history that it’s difficult to keep them straight sometimes, isn’t it?

Here are the correct answers to the questions.  Check your score….

(1)  D.  None of the above.  Statement was made by Hillary Clinton   6/29/2004
(2)  D.  None of the above.  Statement was made by Hillary Clinton   5/29/2007
(3)  D.  None of the above.  Statement was made by Hillary Clinton   6/4/2007
(4)  D.  None of the above.  Statement was made by Hillary Clinton   6/4/2007
(5)  D.  None of the above.  Statement was made by Hillary Clinton   6/4/2007
(6)  D.  None of the above.  Statement was made by Hillary Clinton   9/2/2005

This is the woman who will most likely be the next Democrat candidate for President – possibly as early as 2016.  (I say possibly because there are already Democrats who are working on a plan to keep Obama in office for a third term.)   President Obama all but endorsed Mrs. Clinton the other night in that lame interview on 60 Minutes, (much to the chagrin of Joe Biden, I’m sure.)

The fact that Mrs. Clinton said all these things in the last five to ten years kind of surprises me.  Then again – it really doesn’t. 

Be afraid.  Be very afraid…

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Once Again In New York....


A couple of days ago the New York City Council overwhelmingly voted (44-4) in favor of allowing unemployed residents to sue companies and business owners, with which they had an interview, if they do not get the job. 

You read that correctly.  The City of New York has opened the door to people suing a potential employer because they do not get hired.  I guess the City Council believes it is helping the unemployed but in reality it will most likely result in fewer interviews being granted and fewer people being hired.  Of course, if a person can show they were denied an interview they can probably sue the potential employer for that as well. 

Think about the possibilities.  An unemployed person could lie on his application about his experience, completely fail the interview and if he doesn’t get the job he can sue the interviewing company.  Makes perfect sense to me….

I am beginning to wonder why anyone wants to live in New York City besides liberals who live off of government entitlements and who enjoy government control.  In the last year Mayor Bloomberg has outlawed smoking in public places (such as parks and the beach), has passed new, stricter gun laws, has decided citizens cannot buy soft drinks in cups bigger than 16 ounces, has told hospital Emergency Rooms they cannot give out more than three pain pills to a patient, and now the City Council wants to allow people to sue someone if they don't get a job.  Ironically, Mayor Bloomberg says he will veto this bill if it comes to his desk.  That truly surprises me since Bloomberg has been working hard to turn New York City into a nanny city.  The mayor should jump at this chance to level the playing field!  But it doesn’t really matter because the City Council says if he vetoes the bill they have a large enough majority to override the veto and pass the bill anyway.

One has to wonder what may be next to come out of New York…

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

More Hypocrisy In The Debate On Gun Control....


The other night I was watching FOX News (I know I just put some of my readers off...) and there was a report by an independent reporter who tried to interview Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City, about gun control and the new gun laws in New York.  The reporter, who was immediately demeaned by the left, asked Mayor Bloomberg if he would be willing to give up his personal security team to support the new gun laws in the State of New York.

The man was intercepted by five, (count them) FIVE armed security personnel surrounding Mayor Bloomberg.  You can bet their weapons had more than 7 bullets each in their magazines.  The reporter wasn't a threat to the Mayor.  He merely wanted to know if the Mayor was willing to practice what he preached.  The security staff would not let the man near the Mayor.  They even chased him down the street. 

It seems Mayor Bloomberg believes that while the average NYC citizen should not be able to protect himself from violent criminals, he and others who share his stature should be.  It's the same as the President sending his girls to a school that has armed guards protecting them while he says your kids should not be protected by armed security in their schools.  Of course, people will say that the President’s kids should absolutely be protected because he’s the President.  But in all seriousness, why are his children more special and important than others?  After all – regardless of what some people may think – regardless of what office he holds, he’s a man.  That’s all.  And sorry, but his kids are no more special than any other child in the country.  Certainly no more special than mine.

Dianne Feinstein's predictable anti-gun bill takes almost all guns away from the average law-abiding citizen while exempting her and other government employees from that restriction.  Isn’t that special…? 

It also seems noteworthy that New York’s Governor Mario Cuomo was the first to pass new, more stringent gun legislation following the Sandy Hook School shooting, limiting the number of bullets you can have in a magazine and increasing restrictions on “assault rifles”.  Before signing the bill the governor said "You can overpower the extremists with intelligence and common sense."  I’m not sure if he was talking about pro-gun “extremists” or pro-gun criminals but anyone want to bet the governor’s personal security team carries more than 7 bullets each in their weapons?  It wouldn’t surprise me if they even have an assault rifle or two in their vehicle(s).

But then, politicians are always quick to let us know we are just not as important as they are.  I don’t begrudge Bloomberg or Cuomo their security teams.  God knows in this day and age they probably need them.  But why do they want to limit their constituents’ ability to protect their homes and property?  Who are they to decide what weapon is best for home protection?  Fully automatic weapons are against the law in this country, as are multiple burst weapons, and that’s OK in my book.  A person could do a lot of damage accidentally if they had a weapon that fired on automatic.  (Can you imagine what would have happened to Dick Cheney’s hunting friend if that were the case?)  But an AR-15 for home defense makes perfect sense.  Light weight, accurate, great stopping power and plenty of ammunition if needed.  Some people prefer a shotgun but honestly, a shotgun can cause far more damage, both to a person and a home, than a .223 round. 

How do liberals continue to support such biased politicians and legislation believing those politicians really care about the people?  These politicians care only about retaining their positions come election time and making enough noise to keep their faithful voters on their side.  And in the meantime we law-abiding Americans continue to lose our rights to an ever growing government that is beginning to reek of tyranny.  I believe the President will go all out on his far-left agenda in the next four years.  I only hope the Republicans will find some cojones and stand up to him instead of bending over.  Otherwise it may not matter who we elect in 2016…

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Obama: "If Not For FOX News and Rush Limbaugh Republicans Would Do What I Want." Really?


A couple of days ago in an interview President Obama basically said the only reason some Republicans oppose the things he's doing is because FOX News and Rush Limbaugh make them worry about their seats in the House and what their constituents might think of them.

"The truth is that most of the big issues that are going to make a difference in the life of this country for the next thirty or forty years are complicated and require tough decisions, but are not rocket science. We know that to fix our economy, we've got to make sure: that we have the most competitive workforce in the world, that we have a better education system, that we are investing in research and development, that we've got world-class infrastructure, that we're reducing our health care costs, and that we're expanding our exports. On issues like immigration, we have a pretty good sense of what's broken in the system and how to fix it. On climate change, it's a daunting task. But we know what releases carbon into the atmosphere, and we have tools right now that would start scaling that back, although we'd still need some big technological breakthrough. So the question is not, Do we have policies that might work? It is, Can we mobilize the political will to act?"

"And I think if you talk privately to Democrats and Republicans, particularly those who have been around for a while, they long for the days when they could socialize and introduce bipartisan legislation and feel productive. So I don't think the issue is whether or not there are people of goodwill in either party that want to get something done. I think what we really have to do is change some of the incentive structures so that people feel liberated to pursue some common ground. One of the biggest factors is going to be how the media shapes debates. If a Republican member of Congress is not punished on Fox News or by Rush Limbaugh for working with a Democrat on a bill of common interest, then you'll see more of them doing it."

Really?  Is that what you really believe, Mr. President?  Are you so blinded by your left-wing partisanship that you believe anyone who opposes your views is influenced not by their own rational beliefs but by Rush Limbaugh and FOX News?  Or are you just so narcissistic that you believe no one could disagree with you unless they are forced to disagree by radical right-wing nutjobs?

As much as I hate to bad mouth the President of the United States, after 30 years of serving my country both in the military and in Civil Service, I must say that you, Sir, are displaying the characteristics of an idiot.  Is that a politically correct enough way to express my opinion of what the President says?  I'm trying to be as respectful as I can but it's difficult when the man makes statements like that.  It's interesting how the President attacks the only right leaning news outlet and right leaning talk show hosts because they don't support and agree with his agenda.  The other media outlets seem to have fallen in line with the President.  They never criticize him, don't question his actions, intentions or motives.  They let him do whatever he wants to do and praise things like the "60 Minutes" interview, after which Steve Croft really needed to wipe his face with toilet paper.

It's truly sad that most of the media in this country has become so far left, so in the tank for Obama that the only people in media who oppose him get attacked by the President himself.  It seems beneath the office of the President to attack individual media outlets for not supporting him.  At least, it seems beneath the office of the President if Obama wasn't in it.  I'm not surprised by anything this man does.  If he and his cronies succeed in getting him a third term in office I will be forced to decide if I still want to live in the United States of Obama.  Sad but true.

Monday, January 28, 2013

Wisconsin Sheriff Asks Citizens To Help With Their Own Safety


In Wisconsin recently, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke Jr., took out a controversial 30 second radio ad telling the citizens of Milwaukee County that "Your safety is no longer a spectator sport. I need you in the game."

His advice: Take a gun course and buy a gun. And be ready to use it.

"With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting is no longer your best option.  You can beg for mercy from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back. But are you prepared?  Consider taking a certified safety course in handling a firearm so you can defend yourself until we get there.  You have a duty to protect yourself and your family.  We're partners now.  Can I count on you?"

How interesting - a government worker actually telling people they should buy guns and be ready to use them.  Apparently Sheriff Clark lives by the adage that "When seconds count the police are only minutes away."  Once the bad guy has broken into your home and is coming toward you down the hallway, or once he has put  a gun in your face on a public street, is not the right time to call 911 and hope the police get there.

It's also interesting how Delaware's Attorney General Beau Biden, Vice President Joe Biden's son, just stripped all Delaware County Sherrifs of their arrest authority.  Apparently they cannot interfere with federal agents if they (the feds) want to take guns from citizens.

Our federal government and some states (including New York and Vermont) have or are passing legislation banning "assault rifles".  The term assault rifle is misleading at the very least, since it is merely a semi-automatic rifle that fires a .223 round.  The only difference between a .223 hunting rifle and a so called "assault rifle" is what is on the outside of the weapon.  "Assault rifles" or personal protection rifles as they are rightly called by the manufacturer, are styled to look like a military AR-15.  They do not function like a military weapon however, as in they do not fire fully automatic or even a multiple round burst.  One round, and only one round, is fired each time you pull the trigger.  Like a semi-automatic pistol, you can fire single rounds as fast as you can pull the trigger but only one round will fire.

Some may say you don't need a semi-automatic weapon to protect your home.  Ummm - why do you think all law enforcement agencies now carry semi-automatic weapons?  In a gunfight you don't know how many rounds you need until it's over and you walk away.  Never having been in a gunfight myself (fortunately) I can't speak from experience but from the stories of people I know well who have experienced it - the magazine can empty very quickly.  You should always have enough ammunition to stop your opponent.  And it should not be up to some nutcase elected official to decide how many rounds that needs to be.  Period.

I have taken several law enforcement combat shooting courses in my lifetime, including some with simunitions where it feels like the bad guy is shooting you (because he is.)  Even in a situation that you know is not deadly it's easy to get carried away and empty a magazine.  As I said - you shoot until your opponent stops his attack.  And if you empty a magazine you have another one fully loaded to take its place.  The greater capacity the magazine the greater chances you have of stopping the attack.

The focus in Washington still seems to be on the weapon instead of the person behind it.  Car accidents kill hundreds of thousands of people a year in this country.  Yet there is no focus on the car being the problem.  It's always blamed on the operator.  In like fashion - no gun has ever killed anyone without a person using or misusing it.  So why do we blame the gun for those deaths instead of the operator?  That seems to make anti-gun activists look a little silly...