Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Chris Matthews: "Only Whites Can Be Racist"


Yesterday on “Hardball”, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews made a statement that indicates his belief that only white people can be racists.

Responding to an audio clip from Rush Limbaugh’s radio show earlier in the day, Matthews seized on one caller’s statements to attack Rush.  The caller, citing a couple of incidents where racial remarks had been made and President Obama seemingly ignored them, said it sometimes seems that President Obama inspires the remarks.

The caller was referring to an incident on Easter Sunday when the pastor of St. John’s Episcopal Church in Washington D.C., made the following statement with President Obama in the congregation.  “It drives me crazy when the captains of the religious right are always calling us back … for blacks to be back in the back of the bus, for women to be back in the kitchen, for gays to be in the closet, and for immigrants to be back on their side of the border” said Dr. Luis Leon, Rector.  The caller suggested maybe President Obama inspires people to make statements like these; that maybe people are emboldened by his presence.
I happened to be listening to the show during that call.  Rush’s response, after he summed up the caller’s statements, was “You may be right.”

Apparently that was enough to fuel Matthews’ ire and he then decided Rush needed a lesson on the definition of racism.  Here is Chris Matthews’ definition of racism… “Actually, Rushbo, racism is the belief that one race — whites — should rule all others. Get your definitions straight!”

Apparently Mr. Matthews doesn’t use a dictionary when he’s lecturing others on the definition of words.  Merriam-Webster’s definition is as follows: “Racism – noun – 1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.  2: racial prejudice or discrimination.”  I see nothing in that definition that limits it to one particular race.

Perhaps Matthews isn’t up to date on people like Louis Fararkhan or Mohammed Morsi, or even  Malik Zulu Shabazz, and many other blatant racists throughout history and the world.  Without a doubt white people have their share of racists - and a long history.  (The USA and South Africa come to mind.)  But it’s certainly not limited to whites.  I wonder what Matthews would call those people of color who hate because of skin color, race or ethnicity.  My guess would be “Justified.”  That would be a typical response from the guilt-ridden white left.

A friend of mine heard Matthews’ statement and posted the following comments on Facebook.  “Chris Mathews is the most Ignorant SOB on Air. He should come out of the closet and hook up with Piers Morgan. They could turn the lights down low, open a bottle of Wild Irish Rose, turn on an Obama speech and take turns rubbing the tingles out of each other’s legs!  And both of them could feel superior and not racist since they were watching (their) Black porn! Well,,, half Black Porn...”  Crude, I know.  But I found it hysterically funny - although the mental image it conjures up is a bit disturbing.  I could have done without that.  Thanks for the laugh, Jeremy!

While he beats out CNN consistently in ratings, Matthews’ audience isn’t exactly the largest in cable news.  FOX beats out MSNBC by huge margins every hour.

TV NEWS RATINGS: 25-54 DEMOGRAPHIC (L +SD)
Fox News
CNN
MSNBC
CNN Headline News
5 pm
The5 
339
Blitzer 
131
Matthews 
163
Express 
59
6 pm
Baier 
332
Blitzer 
171
Sharpton 
203
Express 
85
7 pm
Shep 
366
Burnett 
150
Matthews 
250
Velez-Mitchell 
120
8 pm
O’Reilly 
462
Cooper 
188
Schultz 
210
Grace 
140
9 pm
Hannity 
425
Morgan 
205
Maddow 
246
WWYD 
121
10 pm
Van Susteren 
346
Cooper 
141
O’Donnell 
215
WWYD 
158

Chris Matthews is a racist in reverse.  Like many other liberals, he hates white people for being white and will say anything, loudly and boldly, to justify his feelings.  If he had put as much emotion and as many bold statements into Jimmy Carter’s speeches – Carter may have been a more effective President.  Nah…  probably not.

Cyprus II?


I read this the other day and while I am somewhat shocked to see it in print, I can’t say I’m shocked by the information.  Whether it’s true or not I have yet to determine.  But if it is we may have a bigger problem than we realized.


According to what I’ve seen, in-house memos now circulating within the banking industry say the DHS has issued orders to banks across America which announce to them that “under the Patriot Act” the DHS has the absolute right to seize, without any warrant whatsoever, any and all customer bank accounts, to make “periodic and unannounced” visits to any bank to open and inspect the contents of “selected safe deposit boxes.”

Further, the DHS “shall, at the discretion of the agent supervising the search, remove, photograph or seize as evidence” any of the following items “bar gold, gold coins, firearms of any kind unless manufactured prior to 1878, documents such as passports or foreign bank account records, pornography or any material that, in the opinion of the agent, shall be deemed of to be of a contraband nature.”

DHS memos also state that banks are informed that any bank employee, on any level, that releases “improper” “classified DHS Security information” to any member of the public, to include the customers whose boxes have been clandestinely opened and inspected and “any other party, to include members of the media” and further “that the posting of any such information on the internet will be grounds for the immediate termination of the said employee or employees and their prosecution under the Patriot Act.”

Safety deposit box holders and depositors are not given advanced notice when failed banks shut their doors.  If people have their emergency money in a safe deposit box or an account in a bank that closes, they will not be allowed into the bank to get it out. They can knock on the door and beg to get in but the sheriff’s department or whoever is handling the closure will simply say “no” because they are just following orders.


Remember that the Patriot Act and Patriot Act 2 were written and passed in response to 9/11/2001, by the Bush administration.and

Analysis of the 2003 Domestic Security Enhancement Act, (Patriot Act 2) indicates there doesn’t appear to be a need for an “in-house memo” or “written notices to banks” to enact search and seizure of safety deposit box assets – or any other assets, for that matter:

SECTION 103 allows the Federal government to use wartime martial law powers domestically and internationally without Congress declaring that a state of war exists.

SECTION 106 states that government agents must be given immunity for carrying out searches with no prior court approval. This section throws out the entire Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures.

SECTION 122 restates the original Patriot Act assertion that the government has the power of “surveillance without a court order.”

SECTION 123 restates that the government no longer needs warrants and investigations can be “giant drag-net style sweeps.”

SECTION 126 grants the government the right to mine the entire spectrum of public and private sector information from bank records

And finally:

SECTION 312 gives immunity to law enforcement engaging in spying operation against the American people and places restrictions on court injunctions against Federal violations of civil rights.

Now I must admit I was ignorant of some of these.  I knew the government gave itself wire-tapping authority to listen to suspected terrorists and I didn’t have much of a problem with it.  After all – I wasn’t saying anything subversive on my phone. 

So if this particular article above is true and they’re using the Patriot Act to justify it (even if it hasn’t happened yet) then we have the Bush administration to thank for it.  While I continue to believe that George W. Bush did what he believed was best for the safety and security of the country after such a devastating attack from a diabolical enemy, it seems he may have assisted in giving our government somewhat diabolical authority toward its own citizens.  And President “I won’t use drones on Americans just because I have the authority” Obama is probably not the guy to have in charge of power like that.  With the current situation in Cypress and our own economy projected to fail sooner than later, it may be only a matter of time before these powers are enacted “to protect the country and save the economy.”

Things like this should worry even liberals.  If they think Bush violated their rights by signing this stuff into law, how are they going to feel if their liberal hero actually begins to make it happen?  

Monday, April 1, 2013

Problems In The Kitchen...


Warning:  Today's post is about cooking.  There is no political content at all.  The author is solely responsible for the content of this post....


I was in the kitchen a little while ago looking over the ingredients for tonight's dinner menu.  Arden has asked for chicken stir-fry so I had to ensure I had everything to prepare it.
 
I checked the refrigerator to find the chicken I had thawed out the day before and the vegetables I got yesterday at the grocery store. Soy sauce - check.  Everything was there and waiting. 

I opened the pantry door and that's when I realized I had a problem.  There in the open doorway, in the harsh glare of the pantry light I was suddenly confronted with a problem…  I had no nuts!  I was stuck with the realization that Arden would come home for dinner and find out her loving husband (and personal chef) had no nuts.  Where did they go?  They were there the last time I checked!!  I didn’t want to face her without them!  What was I to do???

Thinking quickly I came up with a plan.  Since Arden wasn't due home for another 90 minutes I did what any guy in my situation would do...  I went out to get me some new nuts.  They really weren't all that difficult to find and rather inexpensive in the long run.  (I probably should have gotten some extra ones so I’d never run into this problem again - but I only got what I needed at the time.  Hindsight...)  I went back home with my new nuts feeling better about myself all the way around.  I just couldn't let Arden come home for a good dinner of chicken stir-fry only to discover I had no nuts.  That could easily ruin the entire evening!

For my friends who like to cook...  to impress the woman you love you should always have everything she wants - including your nuts, if the recipe calls for them.  Cashews and peanuts are best for Chinese cooking.  Not sure if you were thinking the same thing....

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Jesus Is Alive And Well


Jesus Christ is alive and well and living in Fort Worth, Texas!

That was an opening line of a sermon I heard in 1979.  The only difference was that I was sitting in the base chapel at the Air Force Academy in Colorado, so the chaplain said Jesus was living at the Air Force Academy instead of in Fort Worth.  Thirty-four years later I still remember him saying that.  Think it made an impression? 

Jesus has followed me around the country and the world my entire life.  I began following Him at about age 14 but He was there with me from the beginning.  Funny thing – He never got tired of moving from place to place following me around.  As long as I turned to Him for everything, he was happy to be there.  And even if I didn’t turn to Him, He was right there, waiting patiently.

Tomorrow is Easter.  Over 2000 years ago, it was the day our Lord rose from the dead after sacrificing Himself for all of mankind - taking all the sins of the world onto His shoulders and becoming the lamb slaughtered on the alter to forgive us of our sins, even today.  He did that long before He knew me but He did it for me.  And for you.  And because of Him we shall live.

“Greater love hath no man than this - that a man lay down his life for his friends.”  - John 15:13.

The Bible assures us that believing in Jesus Christ as our savior will bring us life eternal.  The death of our earthly bodies will be the beginning of our spiritual life everlasting.  The Christian celebration of Easter is our reminder of that promise and the reminder of the intense suffering and pain he endured to ensure that salvation.  No man should ever have to suffer as Jesus did, yet He did it voluntarily as the Son of God.

On this Holy day of celebration may we reflect on His sacrifice and what it means for each of us.  God came to Earth as a man to give His children eternal life.  We didn’t deserve it and we certainly don’t deserve it today.  But if we believe, if we accept His sacrifice for us, we will one day live with Him in paradise.  Imagine the stories He can tell and the answers we can get to things we’ve always wondered.  I always find it fascinating to talk to elderly people and listen to their stories.  Can you imagine having a conversation with God?

On this glorious and triumphant Easter Sunday let us all rejoice and remember - Jesus Christ is alive and well and living in (fill in your town if He’s there with you)_!!!

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Easter...


Easter Special - A Medical Version of the Crucifixion


Thursday, March 28, 2013, is the anniversary date of our Lord's last supper and the night he was taken into custody, tortured and crucified the next day.  I try to post this every year to let people know the true suffering that Jesus Christ endured for our salvation.  It's graphic and gruesome, and I hope everyone will read and understand the text.  May God bless all of you this Easter season and allow you to understand the true meaning of the holiday.

I was in the U.S. Air Force for eight years, from June 1977 until September, 1985. My Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), or job code, was 902 – medic. I became proficient at my duties and took extra training so I was able to function as a paramedic, working much of those eight years in the Emergency Room.

I tell these details of my life because of the article I’m going to post today. As Easter approaches I am reminded of an article I read during my Emergency Room days. I found it fascinating not only because of my medical training but also because, as a believing Christian, it gave me true insight into the actual suffering of Jesus Christ during the days just before, and up to, His crucifixion. Never had I heard such blatant, descriptive details nor the medical explanations for the things that happened to Him in those terrible (for Him) and wonderful (for us) days.

The following is a transcription of a lecture given by Dr. Keith Maxwell, an Orthopedic Surgeon in Asheville, N.C. There have been several studies and article offered by various medical experts around the world and this is but one. Mostly, of the ones I’ve read, they agree.

This article is approached from the perspective of how a physician would assess the injuries of Jesus if he were there to see the actual physical trauma He experienced. Dr. Maxwell speaks plainly, with as little medical jargon as possible. His development of this topic began to evolve one night when Dr. Maxwell, in the emergency room, thought to himself, "If they brought the Lord in here, exactly what would His physical injuries be like?"

Dr. Maxwell hopes through this article to reveal some things that will make us meditate on the actual suffering Jesus experienced in the last hours of his life. In the notes that follow are his conclusions concerning the death of Jesus based on his research, experience as a trauma physician and his understanding of scripture.

In “The Passion Of The Christ”, Mel Gibson did a tremendous job of illustrating, on film, the brutality that Jesus suffered at the hands of the Roman soldiers. However, I think you’ll agree after reading this that Gibson’s movie, as graphic as it was, didn’t come near to reality. I doubt they could do justice to the real thing.

**A warning – this article is very descriptive and graphic. It can be difficult to read if you have a weak stomach and/or a vivid imagination. It’s also a bit long but it’s well worth the read.**

You may or may not have thought of some of the things I'll point out to you tonight, but I hope I can share some things with you that will make the life and death of our Savior a little bit more precious.

By the time He was crucified, Jesus had been up about thirty-six hours without any sleep. We know from Biblical accounts that Jesus was an early riser. There are several places in the gospels where He arose early and went and prayed. We have no reason to believe He did anything other than that the day He had his last meal with his disciples. He likely arose early that morning, spent his day, and subsequently had dinner with the disciples that night - the last supper in the upper room. He was then taken prisoner in the garden of Gethsemane, was led all about the old city of Jerusalem and was tried at least twice. The next day at about daybreak He was actually hung on the cross, and hung there throughout that day. Between the time He arose and the time He actually died on the cross, a period of about thirty-six hours had passed, with no sleep or rest.

Something else you may not have thought of was how far Jesus actually walked about in the old city of Jerusalem. We know He was led about from the chief priest's house to Herod's to Pilate's during the time that He was being tried, and we know He was led all about the old city of Jerusalem. If you add it up, He walked about two and one half miles that last night. Also, as best we can ascertain from historical accounts, Jesus carried His cross about a third of a mile before He collapsed and wasn't able to carry it anymore. These are some physical exertions that added up, place stress on a person.

The next thing I want to talk about is a phenomenon called hemathidrosis. Hemathidrosis is a very rare medical phenomenon that's been reported about twelve to fourteen times in world medical literature and is only seen in people who are under tremendous stress and agony. In hemathidrosis, a person actually exudes blood from every sweat gland in their body. Each sweat gland has a small capillary that surrounds it, and in hemathidrosis, that small capillary ruptures. As it bursts, a person actually bleeds into their sweat glands. Instead of perspiring sweat, if you will, they actually perspire blood. The Bible gives an excellent description of this phenomenon, saying that the Lord's sweat became as great drops of blood. Indeed, every pore of Jesus' body oozed and drained blood.

Now, I believe that Christ was a man just as much as any one of us. But at the same time, I believe that Christ was God and knew the terrible fate that lay ahead of Him. He knew the job He had come to this earth to do, the mission He had to fulfill, and I believe the man part of Christ dreaded this agonizing death and torture that lay a few hours ahead of Him just as much as anyone of us would. We know He prayed in the garden of Gethsemane, saying 'Father, if it be your will, let this cup pass from me.' But He submitted His will to his Father's. There in the garden of Gethsemane, Jesus was under about as much anxiety and physical stress from an emotional standpoint that a human could experience, knowing that in a few hours He would be delivered into one of the most agonizing and brutal deaths ever recorded in history.

Why didn't the Lord bleed to death if he bled out of every sweat gland in His body? If you've been to Israel, as I have, you know that this time of year you have warm days and cool nights. It was this cool night air that probably caused the Lord's damp skin, covered with sweat and blood, to chill, causing the capillaries to constrict and stop the bleeding. This same chilling in the cold night air has kept many a drunk and hoodlum who I've seen shot or stabbed and who's then lain in a ditch all night, from dying. It causes the blood vessels to constrict and causes the blood loss to be minimal. But by the time Jesus was taken by the soldiers from the garden of Gethsemane, He probably had a mixture of sweat and blood over His entire body surface. I can imagine this was some sight to behold.

Let's talk about the scourging. Scourging was such a horrible torture that Roman citizens were forbade to be scourged - only slaves and traders could be scourged. It was one of the worst punishments the Romans had to inflict on a human body. Typically, the victim was stripped completely naked and tied by his wrists to a post or wall with his back exposed. He was then whipped from the back of his arms, down his shoulders and back, across his bare buttocks, down the back of his legs and calves, all the way down to his heels by two Roman legionnaires, one on either side, alternating blows.

The historical accounts tell us that the traditional scourging consisted of thirty-nine lashes. If you can, imagine two large, strong, burly Roman legionnaires (someone that we would equate to say, a pro football player today) with a wooden handled whip about eighteen inches long that had nine leather thongs, something akin to what we would call a cat-o-nine tails. The nine leather thongs were about six to seven feet long, and at the end of each thong was some lead shot, like a sinker you'd use to go fishing. Attached to the lead shot were pieces of sheep and cattle bone. The idea of those small pieces of bone was that, as the Roman legionnaire would beat his victim, snapping his wrist would cause the weight of the metal shod to dig into the back, while the sheep/cattle bone cut the skin.

As the sheep/cattle bone lacerated the skin and actually dug in under the surface of the skin, the skilled and trained legionnaire could whip his wrist and literally lift small shards of skeletal muscle out through the skin, leaving small ribbons of muscle, about two inches long, hanging through the skin.

"When I was working on this, I looked in the cadaver lab and did some dissection, trying to figure out what one blow like this would mean to you and me. As best I could tell, and from some of the information I was able to gather from the Shroud of Turin exhibit, one lash with this whip - one thong - would make a cut about two inches long and about three quarters to an inch deep. To put that into medical terms, that's a cut that takes about twenty stitches to close. So with one lash, one swing of the whip, a total of nine lacerations could be inflicted on the victim, each laceration two inches long and three quarters to one inch deep.

With one blow, one Roman legionnaire could inflict enough wounds to take one hundred eighty stitches to close. If you multiply that times thirty-nine, those two Roman legionnaires inflicted enough lacerations to take about 2,000 stitches to close. I've seen people who've gone through the windshield of a car or wrecked a motorcycle into a barbed wire fence, and I've still never seen anyone that tattered up in any of my medical experience. This gives you an idea of the amount of the physical trauma that was inflicted upon Jesus just from the scourging.

Again you'd ask why Jesus didn't bleed to death. And again, you have to remember that this was done in the cold night air, the very thing that caused His blood vessels and capillaries to constrict and actually cause the blood loss from this beating to be minimal.

As mentioned, the idea of the lead weight was to lift the skeletal muscle out. Imagine having a cut on your skin with an inch of muscle pulled out through the cut, exposed to the night air. We see this sometimes in stab wounds or when people are stabbed with sharp objects like sticks and the muscles are pulled back through the skin. The purpose this served in the scourging was that as the victim hung on the cross in the heat of the day, birds could light on him and actually peck and pull at these pieces of muscle, just like a robin trying to pull a worm out of the ground.

Frequently, how long a person actually survived on the cross during the crucifixion was determined by how severely he was scourged. Sometimes they would beat a man nearly to death before they put him on the cross and he would only live a few hours. Most of the time, though, the scourging was intended for public humiliation and embarrassment, because it was such an inhumane method of torture.

Another thing you may not have considered.... TV has done a real injustice to trauma, depicting men in bar room fights who take blows to the face or head and jump up and beat up three or four men. I can tell you that it's really not that way in real life. If I took any one of the men here, tied his hands behind him and then let any other man of average size and build beat him in the face with his fists open and closed, I cannot begin to tell you the amount of trauma this would inflict on him.

We know that Jesus was beaten in the face and head as He was mocked. I can assure you with all confidence that by the time the Lord was crucified after His beatings, it's almost certain that both of His eyes were swollen shut and no doubt his nose was pouring blood. I can also tell you that when people are struck in the mouth with a fist, the first thing that happens is that the lower teeth come right through the lip. I've taken care of many people in the emergency room who've come in beaten up in fights with their teeth sticking through their lips, both upper and lower sides. If Jesus was tied and held and beaten in the face by these strong legionnaires, I don't think there's any doubt that His lips were tattered like paper and some of His teeth were knocked loose or maybe even knocked out. You might ask if his jaw bones were broken. Normally they would be, but not in Jesus' case; and I'll tell you why in a few minutes.

During Jesus' trials and humiliation we also know that a crown of thorns was plaited and placed on His head. In Christ's case this was done to mock Him as being King of the Jews. Some of you have been to Israel and have seen these thorns. They're about an inch and one half to two inches long, and they're as sharp as an ice pick. The custom was to take a small three or four foot long reed and slap the thorns on top of the head of the victim in order to drive the thorns into the skull. Those thorns laid upon someone's head and then tapped down with a reed were hard enough to penetrate the outer table or the outer bone of the skull. Imagine the bleeding from three or four hundred puncture wounds in the scalp and around the forehead from these thorns.

So, before Jesus' crucifixion ever begins, His face has been beaten to a pulp, no doubt His eyes were swollen shut, His nose is bloodied, and I remind you that every pore in His skin has wept and oozed blood. Every visible surface on the good Lord Jesus, I am confident, was covered and caked with dried blood. And His back and his arms and His buttocks and the back of His legs were literally torn to shreds from the scourging. This was the shape Jesus was in before they ever gave Him His cross to head out to Calvary.

Now, one of the things I take issue with from agnostics who I've heard debate this - I do not think the Lord died from shock secondary to blood loss. There is nothing that Jesus said on the cross and nothing in the description of the crucifixion in any of the gospels that gives us any idea that Jesus was in shock before He died. How do I know that? When someone is shot or hit by a car and comes to the emergency room, they're not sitting up talking to you. Their eyes are glassy, their color is pale, their blood pressure is about sixty over nothing and they're barely conscious, if conscious at all. Jesus never lost consciousness. There's nothing in the description of His trials, His scourging or His time on the cross that tells us He was incoherent mentally or lost consciousness.

Something else, physical stress - everything the Bible tells us about the life of Jesus is that He was a healthy, early thirties male who lived a rough life. He didn't have a home, He probably slept outside, and He walked everywhere He went. He was probably, as we would say, as tough as a pine knot. I think Jesus was a hardy young man, very strong and stout physically, and that there was nothing weak or puny about Him from a medical standpoint, prior to the crucifixion. As far as emotional stress, I don't think Jesus had any kind of nervous breakdown. He was certainly under stress in the garden of Gethsemane, but nothing that He said on the cross gave any indication whatsoever that He was decompensating mentally, even during His gravest hours on the cross.

I've also heard cardiac arrhythmia debated as a cause of Jesus' death. When people go into cardiac arrhythmia, if it's ventricular tachycardia or some of the other types of cardiac arrhythmia's, one of the first things that happens is that the heart, even though it beats fast or funny, doesn't function very well as a pump. When it doesn't function well as a pump, your blood pressure drops, and you lose consciousness. Again, nowhere in the gospels do we have an account where Jesus ever lost consciousness until he died.

Let's talk about the cross for just a minute. We know from Corinthian and Roman history that the crosses were usually in two parts. First, the cross bar, that from very good historical accounts can be estimated to have a weight of 125 to 150 pounds, and to be about the size of a cross tie.

Many of us have stacked or used cross ties at one time or another or have certainly seen what they look like on the railroad tracks. I want to remind you that this was a rough, unplanned, unfinished piece of wood with splinters and spikes and rough places in it, just like you would expect to see in a railroad cross tie. When the victim's final trial and condemnation had taken place, to maximize the shame and suffering, the custom was to tie the cross bar to the victim, and have him carry it through the city from his point of condemnation to his point of execution.

Part of the custom was that many times these people would be forced to stagger through the streets after being scourged and beaten, with the cross bar tied to their arms, and to add to the ultimate humiliation, the victim had to bear the cross naked. Imagine how humiliating that would be in this day and time, much less how humiliating and agonizing it must have been for Jesus.

The other part of the cross was an upright part, which is just like a post in the ground. Every major city at that time had an area outside their gates where they performed crucifixions. It was really not only a form of execution, but of entertainment as well. Many of the major cities had areas outside their walls where they would have three or four of these upright posts that were permanent fixtures. Someone condemned to crucifixion would bear the cross bar through the streets to the point of crucifixion, and once there, would be thrown onto the ground. Nails would then be driven through their hands into the cross bar. Then two forks, something similar to pitch forks, would be placed around each end of the cross bar, and they would be boosted up and the cross bar hung on top of the upright post. Once they were braced on the upright post, both feet would then be nailed to the foot piece.

The nail wounds.... The Romans practiced crucifixion for hundreds of years, and they perfected the art of pain and suffering. How could a man have spikes driven through his hands and feet and not bleed to death? The Romans figured out that if they drove the spike through a man's wrist right at the middle, they could avoid hitting any arteries or veins. If you go back and look at the Hebrew word for hand, it's inclusive from the fingertips to about where your wristwatch crosses your wrist. So the hand didn't necessarily mean the palm, and I can tell you, from having been a hand surgeon at one time and from dissecting cadavers to try to see if the muscle was strong enough to hold the body weight, it's not. You can not drive a spike through a man's palm and hang him by it without it pulling right out between his fingers. It is an accepted medical fact that the muscle in your palm is not strong enough to support your body weight.

In order to be able to drive spikes through the Lord's hands, they had to drive them through at the wrists. There, there's a very strong ligament, called the traverse carpal ligament, that's strong enough to support the body weight. The Romans figured out that if they came about where the crease in the wrist is and drove the spike through this area, they would miss the radial artery (the artery people cut when they try to kill themselves by cutting their wrist - right where the doctor takes your pulse), and they would also miss what we call the ulnar artery over on the little finger side. What they would do though, is drive the nail right through the biggest nerve in the hand, called the median nerve. If any of y'all have ever had carpal tunnel syndrome, you know how uncomfortable any inflammation or irritation to that median nerve can be.

When the median nerve is transected, it gives about the sensation of having an electric cattle prod stuck to your wrist and a constant electrical shock going through your hand, and causes the fingers to claw. In essence, the Romans devised a way they could drive a spike through a man's hand and not lose one drop of blood, while maximizing the amount of pain and suffering that man would endure.

The Romans did the same thing with the feet. They calculated where they could drive a spike through both a man's feet and not cause blood loss that would cause the victim to bleed to death. The spike would have been placed between the first and second metatarsal bones, missing the dorals pedis artery. There again, they drove the spike through the feet with no blood loss. The spike misses the artery, but does hit the plantar nerves, thereby causing that same horrible shock sensation.

Let's talk now about Jesus hanging on the cross. When hanging by their arms, as a crucifixion victim's body weight sags down, their diaphragm functions like a billows. As the diaphragm drops into the abdomen it pulls in air, so someone hanging on the cross had no difficulty whatsoever pulling air into their lungs. The tough part for people hanging on the cross was breathing out.

In order for a crucifixion victim to exhale, they would have to pull up against the spikes with their hands, and push up against the spikes with their feet. I want to remind you - here's Jesus hanging on the cross, probably naked in front of the whole city of Jerusalem. I've already described His back to you.

Every time He took a breath, that tattered, lacerated and riddled back was drug and scraped across the splinters and the rough knobs and spikes protruding from the cross. Each time He breathed out, each time He uttered a word, He would have to pull up with His arms and push up with His legs. That's why I want to remind you just how precious Jesus' words from the cross were. That's why He couldn't say more than three or four words at a time. Because when you talk, you only talk as you breathe out, not as you breathe in. Every word Jesus spoke on the cross was spoken as He was pulling up against the nails and dragging His back across the cross.

That's why what the Lord tells us - what He spoke from the cross - is very precious to me, because I know what it cost Him and how badly it hurt Him. Every time I give this talk it reminds me how He died for us and just how every word hurt and how He suffered just to give us every word. What did He say? He said, 'Behold your son." And then He said 'Behold your mother.' Jesus knew He had just about finished His job and done everything that He'd come into this world to fulfill and do. Finally, when He had done all of that He said, 'It is finished.' And when He said 'It is finished", that's the last time He pulled up with His hands and pushed up with His feet, dragging His back across the cross as He hung there naked before the city of Jerusalem in total shame and humiliation. Convicted and tortured and condemned for something of which He was not guilty.

If you go back and look at historical accounts, you find that people actually lived on the cross, crucified, for up to six days. If you can, imagine a man hanging on a cross outside the gates of a city with the birds pecking at his eyes and roosting on his head, as he hangs there naked as a spectacle for the whole city. That was the point of this. It was part of the shame and humiliation that a man hang there so people could come by for a day or two and stand and mock and jeer and shout accusations and railings and blasphemy at him. The idea was to make him suffer as much as possible. Crucifixion was never intended to kill anybody.

*Crucifixion was never intended to kill anybody.* It was only intended to make a human being suffer as much as could be inflicted upon him before killing him by breaking his legs. But I don't believe Jesus died from crucifracture or from exhaustion asphyxia either.

Crucifracture is what they would do when they simply grew tired of watching this agony and suffering or when they had something better to do and wanted to end a crucifixion. They would take a spear and swing it like a ball bat and hit the victim in the shins to break his shin bones. They'd break the tibula and the fibula bone. Many times they would have to beat the legs for five or ten minutes until they finally could break the shin bones - it takes a lot of force to break your shin bone. With the shin bone broken, the victim could no longer push up to breathe.

Why didn't they break Jesus' legs? If you go back to the Psalms - I believe the 34th chapter - it says "Not a bone of His body was broken." This is why Jesus' nose and jaws and cheekbones should have been broken but couldn't have been. The 34th chapter of Psalms wouldn't let that take place. And that's why the Roman centurion didn't break His legs, because the Bible says "Not a bone of his body was broken."

That was totally uncharacteristic of the crucifixion, because that's how crucifixion victims died. When they grew tired of you and got bored with the situation they'd break your legs and in about four to six minutes you'd smother to death, because you could no longer push up with your legs. You laid there sagging, unable to breathe out, and you were asphyxiated in about four to six minutes. That's how the two thieves died. But Jesus was dead already.

Let's go back to the 19th chapter of John. What happened? What did they do when they went to the first thief? The Roman centurion broke his legs. What did he do when he went to the second thief? He broke his legs. But when the centurion went to Jesus, the Bible says He was dead already.

Now why would a young, strapping, healthy man be dead after being on the cross for six hours? There's absolutely no medical explanation for it at all. Excuse my interpretation here, but the Lord had no business being dead. He should have been alive just like the other two. He wasn't beaten to the point of death, His blood loss was minimal and we know He wasn't in shock, because everything He told us from the cross made sense. He identified His mother standing at some distance from the foot of the cross. He was able to see enough to identify her and to identify one of the disciples. And everything He said was coherent. He was not out of His mind and He was not having a nervous breakdown, and He wasn't even in shock from blood loss. The Lord was perfectly coherent and sane up to the moment he died."

"The spear wound to the Lord's side was not the cause of his death either. When the centurion saw that Jesus was dead already, he thrust a spear into Jesus' side. The Bible says in Zachariah that they may look upon Him who they've pierced. The spear thrust was biblical prophecy fulfilled. That was one of the reasons why Jesus was already dead; God had a plan that we were to look upon the one they had pierced - Zachariah had to be fulfilled.

Roman centurions were trained killers. They were taught how to deliver death blows that would take a man's life in a matter of seconds. I've taken care of many gunshot victims to the chest. A person can take a .22 through the left side of the heart and likely come in sitting up talking to you. However, if you're stabbed or shot on the right side of the heart, where the inferior and superior vena cava are emptying into the right side of the heart, you're unconscious and pretty close to dead in about twenty to thirty seconds.

This blow to Jesus was no doubt delivered from the right side through the right lung into the heart and on into the spine. It would have penetrated somewhere between the seventh and eighth intercostal space probably on the right. But the Bible says that blood and water came out of Jesus' side after the spear was thrust in. Now if you take a unit of blood, drain it out of a human being's body, put it in a quart jar and set it on top of a desk, in about thirty minutes the red blood cells begin to settle out and the plasma rises to the top. The plasma separates from the red blood cells. When the soldier thrust the spear into the Lord's side, Jesus had already been dead for thirty or forty-five minutes. Maybe you've never thought about that. The spear wound did not take the life of the Lord Jesus; He was dead already when they thrust the spear into His side.

So let me conjecture a little about what I think. I think there's a very good description of the crucifixion in the Bible and there's very good medical evidence that can be pulled out of that description that tells us that the Lord did not die in the manner that most crucifixion victims die. When the Roman centurion went to him to break His legs, he was dead already. They couldn't break His legs because the Bible said in Psalms, "Not a bone of His body shall be broken." Why then would the soldier thrust a spear into His side? Because Zachariah told us hundreds of years before that we'd look upon Him that we'd pierced. And what came out? Blood and water - I think there's enough medical evidence there that the Lord was dead at least a half an hour.

So what took the Lord's life? No man did. No man, no Roman centurion, no cross took Jesus' life. He was able to do something I've never seen another human being do - He laid down his life. When it was finished and with a loud voice, He gave up the ghost. Jesus gave his life."

"The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life - only to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father." (NIV) John 10:17,18

I'm deeply blessed ... Our Lord conquers death and gives life... Amen!

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

The Miracle That Is St. Paul's Chapel


On April 30, 1789, George Washington took the oath of office as the first President of the United States on the second floor balcony of Federal Hall in New York City.  Immediately following the ceremony he went inside the building and delivered his first Presidential address to Congress.

Following the address, President Washington led the entire Senate and House of Representatives several blocks away to St. Paul’s Chapel where they would gather for prayer to commit the future of our nation into God’s hands.  It was recorded in the Annals of Congress as part of the first-ever joint session of Congress.  The inauguration of the newly formed United States of America began with a gathering of our elected officials before God.

In his inaugural address, Washington acknowledged God’s hand at work in the nation and asked for his blessings on the country.  “Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes, and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success the functions allotted to his charge.  In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own, nor those of my fellow-citizens at large less than either.  No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than those of the United States.”

In 1789, St. Paul’s Chapel, which sits between what is now Broadway and Church Street at Fulton.  The entrance in 1789 was on the Church Street side and at that time the church owned the large field that was between it and the bay.  Interestingly, that field in the early 70s became the sight of the World Trade Center.  

On September 11, 2001, when the twin towers and several other buildings were brought down by terrorists, St. Paul’s Chapel survived without so much as a broken window.  (The church’s organ was damaged by dust and smoke but has since been restored.)  It is believed that the church was protected from damage by a “miracle” sycamore tree that sat on the corner of the property between the twin towers and the church.  The tree was destroyed by debris and has since been replaced by a cedar tree which, many believe, is the modern day fulfillment of Isaiah 9:10 following the Assyrians’ attack on Israel.  In fact, some believe the attack on the World Trade Center and was a warning from God to turn away from its ungodly ways and seek God in all things, also according to Isaiah.

“The bricks have fallen, but we will build with dressed stones; the sycamores have been cut down, but we will put cedars in their place.”  Isaiah 9:10

(Several years after the attack a cornerstone – a dressed stone - was laid in place at the base of where the new tower was to be erected.)

Whatever the reason, the very place where our first official government met to ask God’s favor on our nation miraculously survived the destruction of the World Trade Center that occurred literally in its back yard.  And it survived virtually unscathed.  One could call it a coincidence, I suppose, but I believe God’s hand protected the little chapel for a reason.  Call me crazy.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Stepping On Jesus Part 2


It seems sometimes people and/or organizations do the right thing.
On Saturday, I posted an article about a student at Florida Atlantic University who was suspended from a class for refusing to participate in a class exercise in which students were instructed by the professor to write the name “Jesus” on a piece of paper, put it on the floor and step on it.  Ryan Rotela, a devout Mormon, found the assignment offensive, refused to participate and later reported his concerns to the professor’s supervisor.  Later in the day he learned he had been suspended from the class and faced possible expulsion from school.

After a national outcry, FAU has issued a formal apology to Rotela saying they realize the exercise was offensive to many students and that they are “deeply sorry” for events as they happened.  Rotela will be able to finish the class with a different instructor.

“First and foremost, we are deeply sorry for any hurt regarding this incident, any insensitivity that may have been seen by the community and the greater community at large,” said Corey King, Dean of Students. “We are deeply sorry.”

In my post the other day I said I doubted an assignment like that would have been in the actual course curriculum but I may be wrong about that.  According to an article I read today, the assignment may have come straight from the book.

“Have the students write the name JESUS in big letters on a piece of paper,” the lesson reads. “Ask the students to stand up and put the paper on the floor in front of them with the name facing up. Ask the students to think about it for a moment. After a brief period of silence instruct them to step on the paper. Most will hesitate. Ask why they can’t step on the paper. Discuss the importance of symbols in culture.”

It seems to me if the professor didn’t use Rotela’s refusal to step on the paper to begin a discussion then she failed at using the lesson properly. 

King said it was obvious the lesson caused “hurt and pain” within the community and within the university’s population.

“As a result, we feel it’s necessary to no longer offer this assignment or activity,” he said. “We did not anticipate the hurt and pain it would cause in the community.

Score one for religious freedom at a university…